North Korea’s Failure to Denuclearize Isn’t the End of the World

On Monday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo returned from what he described as “productive” conversations with North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un. Although details are still emerging from the meeting, which took place in Pyongyang, one outcome is clear: Both sides are eager to push forward with a second summit between President Donald Trump and Kim as soon as possible.

But the question of “denuclearization” still hangs over these negotiations. Despite North Korea’s consistent assertion that it will not disarm “unilaterally” and that Washington must remove sanctions against the country, the leaders of the United States and South Korea seem convinced that it is finally serious about giving up its nuclear arsenal. President Trump has repeatedly defended Kim as an “honorable” man, committed to denuclearization. After three meetings with Kim, South Korean President Moon Jae In seems even more convinced that Kim—unlike his father and grandfather—is serious.

Most North Korea and nuclear experts—the authors of this article, included—doubt that Kim has decided to abandon his nuclear-weapons program. North Korea has an established pattern of dragging out negotiations and breaking its commitments. In addition, the baseline conditions necessary for Kim to make such a strategic change appear to be absent.

[Further reading: North Korea is not denuclearizing]

For example, Kim would need assurances that whatever concessions the Trump administrations provides— such as a peace declaration leading to a peace treaty or the reduction or removal of U.S. troops on the Korean Peninsula—are permanent and legally binding. He also likely needs to believe that Seoul is committed to a foreign policy untethered to U.S. preferences, and that North Korea’s nuclear-weapons program—upon which he has staked his legitimacy and power and his country’s security and prosperity—is a greater threat to these goals than an asset. On top of all this, he would almost certainly have to be convinced that he would not suffer the fate of Muammar Qaddafi and Saddam Hussein, key examples that the regime brings up to assert its nuclear weapons status.

Even the steps North Korea has taken to date, which include reportedly destroying a nuclear-weapons test site and dismantling a missile-test facility, are either reversible or have little to no technical impact, given the advanced state of its nuclear and missile programs. In essence, they are low- to no-cost moves for Pyongyang.

But leaders can always surprise us. Libya abandoned a …read more

Source:: The Atlantic – Global

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *